UVA Today Ranks Second of Six University Newsrooms for AI Citations
Four Steps to Be Named in More of Those Answers
Of six university newsrooms compared, UVA Today ranks second in AI answers citing its reporting, behind Berkeley News. Those 2,698 answers drew on 1,428 UVA Today stories across four answer engines and named UVA Today in 19 of them, or 7 per 1,000. This report shows where UVA Today leads and four steps: two to help answer engines name UVA Today, and two to build on the formats they already use most.
Cited means an AI answer used a UVA Today story as a source. Named means the answer also mentioned UVA Today by name.
UVA Today’s reporting is cited across 1,428 stories and four answer engines
Answer engines cited UVA Today stories in 2,698 answers in the September snapshot. Only Berkeley News, at 3,087, was cited in more.
Those answers drew on 1,428 different UVA Today stories, the second-widest range in the set after Duke Today. UVA Today is cited on all four answer engines in Semrush’s report: Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Google AI Mode and Gemini.
UVA Today also ranks second for how often it is named, with 19 answers. The chart compares both.
| Newsroom | Answers citing | Stories cited | Answers naming | Named per 1,000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley News | 3,087 | 1,035 | 38 | 12.3 |
| UVA Today | 2,698 | 1,428 | 19 | 7.0 |
| Duke Today | 2,139 | 1,552 | 16 | 7.5 |
| Vanderbilt News | 1,704 | 1,048 | 12 | 7.0 |
| UT News | 1,576 | 699 | 14 | 8.9 |
| Michigan News | 962 | 474 | 14 | 14.6 |
Peers show the naming rate can roughly double
UVA Today is named in 7 of every 1,000 answers that cite it. Berkeley News is named in 12 and Michigan News in 15.
Duke Today, Vanderbilt News and UT News sit between 7 and 9, close to UVA Today, so low naming rates are common across this set. At Berkeley’s rate, UVA Today’s current citations would produce about 33 named answers instead of 19.
This data does not show what drives naming. Michigan News, named most often, has no structured data on its most-cited story. One gap is something University Communications can close directly, though. The structured data on UVA Today articles names the headline and writer, but not the publication. Berkeley News names its site in the same data.
Closing that gap takes one template update, so we recommend making the change now and comparing the naming rate against today’s baseline in a later snapshot.
| Detail | UVA Today | Berkeley News | Michigan News |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headline | Stated | Stated | Not stated |
| Writer | Name only | Named person, linked to an author page | Not stated |
| Site or publication name | Not stated | Site named “Berkeley News” | Not stated |
| Publisher of the article | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Dates | Creation date only | Published and last updated | Not stated |
Checked in September 2026 on two UVA Today stories, which matched, and on the most-cited story at Berkeley News and Michigan News. Every site names itself on the visible page. This table covers only the structured data.
Explainers are UVA Today’s strongest format
Question-led explainers and Q&As earn 32 percent of UVA Today’s citations. The next highest newsroom is Michigan News, at 12 percent.
A UVA Today explainer is cited in an average of 4.0 answers, against 2.3 for a typical UVA Today story. Five of the eight most-cited explainers are posed as a reader’s question, and the most-cited names a UVA School of Nursing professor in its first paragraph.
The format is an established part of UVA Today’s editorial approach, and it accounts for the largest share of the site’s citations.
Most-cited UVA Today explainers
Research coverage has the most room to grow
Research stories earn 5 percent of UVA Today’s citations. At UT News, Berkeley News and Michigan News, the figure ranges from 13 to 18 percent.
A UVA Today research story is cited in an average of 1.7 answers, against 4.0 for an explainer. Health stories, many of them written as explainers, average 4.4.
The chart shows the mix at each newsroom.
| Newsroom | Explainers | Research | Health | History and culture | University life |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UVA Today | 32.1% | 5.4% | 19.9% | 13.6% | 13.6% |
| Berkeley News | 8.5% | 14.1% | 4.1% | 8.2% | 6.6% |
| Michigan News | 12.3% | 17.6% | 14.2% | 5.9% | 3.5% |
| Duke Today | 9.4% | 3.0% | 6.1% | 4.3% | 8.6% |
| UT News | 7.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 5.8% | 14.3% |
| Vanderbilt News | 3.9% | 6.2% | 10.0% | 6.3% | 15.2% |
Four steps, each with a clear marker of progress
| Step | Owner | Effort | What good looks like |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Add publication details to article structured data | University Communications | One template update | Every article’s structured data names UVA Today as publisher, the writer as a person, and the published and updated dates. |
| 2Turn the Contact Us page into an About page | University Communications | Low | news.virginia.edu/about opens with a sentence describing UVA Today as the University of Virginia’s news publication. |
| 3Keep building the explainer library | UVA Today editors | Ongoing | Explainers keep their 32 percent share of citations or grow it, and the most-cited are reviewed each semester. |
| 4Pair research stories with a Q&A | UVA Today editors | Per story | Each major research story this semester has a companion Q&A, cited at close to the explainer average of 4.0. |
| How to track progress | University Communications | Any later snapshot | Named answers per 1,000 citing answers, compared with today’s baseline of 7. |
- Answer engine
- An AI tool that answers a question directly, such as ChatGPT, Gemini or Google’s AI Overviews.
- Citation
- The answer used a UVA Today story as one of its sources.
- Named answer
- The answer names UVA Today in the text the reader sees. An answer can cite a story without naming the publication.
- Named per 1,000
- Named answers for every 1,000 answers that cite a newsroom. UVA Today’s is 7.
- Structured data
- A machine-readable summary a page provides for search and answer engines, separate from what readers see.
- Snapshot
- Semrush’s measurement for a single month. This report uses September 2026.
How this was measured
- Source and period. Semrush AI Visibility, U.S., all models. Figures are Semrush’s September 2026 monthly snapshot. Semrush’s trend view covers April through September 2026.
- Scope. news.virginia.edu, compared with news.berkeley.edu, today.duke.edu, news.umich.edu, news.utexas.edu and news.vanderbilt.edu.
- UNC. UNC’s The Well (unc.edu/thewell) was reviewed and left out. Its stories are published outside the section Semrush measured, so only two landing pages registered, and most matching answers referred to an unrelated facility at another university that shares the name.
- Answer engines. Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, ChatGPT and Gemini.
- Citing and naming. Semrush counts an answer as citing a newsroom when it uses one of the newsroom’s pages as a source, and as naming it when the newsroom appears in the answer text. One answer can cite more than one story.
- Named counts. Named answers are small numbers, 12 to 38 per newsroom, so month-to-month changes of a few answers are normal. The trend is best read over several snapshots.
- Story types. Classified from each cited story’s web address. “University life” covers stories about each university’s students, events and community. A story can belong to more than one type, and the shares are approximate.
- Structured data. Checked in September 2026 on two UVA Today stories and on the most-cited story at Berkeley News and Michigan News.
- Monthly audience. Semrush also reports a “Monthly Audience” figure. It estimates the total search audience of the topics where a site appears, not the site’s own readership, and is not used in this report.